Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andersen Windows

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep (WP:SNOW); add references and cleanup. Non-admin closure. D.M.N. (talk) 16:46, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Andersen Windows

Andersen Windows (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Speedy Delete Article is written like an advertisement, with many links to the companies website. Only one reference which links to a company report. Ļıßζېấשּׂ~ۘ Ώƒ ﻚĢęخ (talk) 05:53, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

• Keep, cleanup & source. (One of?) the largest replacement window manufacturers in the US, if not the world. AFD is not cleanup. And if you really thought it deserved speedy, you used the wrong process. --Dhartung | Talk 10:55, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
• Keep per Dhartung. This looks more like a case of good faith editors relying of primary sources, a common and fixable problem. Plenty of 3rd-party sources available to fix POV issues. • Gene93k (talk) 11:25, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

• Keep and cleanup. Andersen is, at least in North America, highly notable. —Travis^talk 13:05, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

• Keep per above. The company is indeed notable, and large enough in scope to justify an article. Some cleanup is required, and I'd like to see a more neutral tone - but, those are separate issues. UltraExactZZ ^Claims ~ Evidence 14:41, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

• Keep. Perhaps this should be stubbed to remove promotional language; but this is a notable business making consumer goods, one that easily meets the "heard of it before seeing a Wikipedia article" test. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:48, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.