Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anders Ibsen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:04, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Anders Ibsen

Anders Ibsen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Poorly sourced WP:BLP of a person notable only as a city councillor, in a city not large enough to carry its city councillors over WP:GNG (that distinction only goes to major, internationally famous global cities, not to places on the order of Tacoma.) This is sourced almost entirely to primary sources, like his own profile on the city's website and a set of committee meeting minutes -- there's just one piece of actual media coverage here, and it's an overview article of the entire city council election in an alt-weekly. So it's not a source that can carry a city councillor over GNG all by itself. Bearcat (talk) 01:06, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

• Delete members of the city council of Tacoma are not default notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:24, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
• Delete by all means as not only is he not actually notable as a politician, this also then is formatted like a job listing, therefore suggesting PR concerns, there's nothing at all close to suggest this could actually be accepted and improved, because there are in fact no improvements to his career information. SwisterTwister talk 06:22, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:11, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:11, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.