Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anders Bircow

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:36, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Anders Bircow[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Utterly Wp:NN performer. A few g-hits but appears to be a solo performer at weddings and part of a group that was once broadcast to 300,000 people. Toddst1 (talk) 01:17, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 22:44, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 22:44, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 22:44, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Meets the GNG - massive press coverage in Denmark, little of it useful for building an encyclopedic biography (for example much coverage of his moving from one residence to another, such as this article where the headline is that he objects to the canine feces outside his new luxury flat in Copenhagen), but I've added a little information to the article and the coverage does demonstrate notability. Yngvadottir (talk) 04:48, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In that case we should add that he is "tired of dog shit" to the Wikipedia article, because that appears to be what he's notable for. Toddst1 (talk) 06:44, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No, that is a glaring example of the tabloid coverage that doesn't add useful info. I must admit this was a relatively unedifying search. But most of it does mention his success as an entertainer to explain obsessing over things like his objection to poop on the sidewalk :-) Yngvadottir (talk) 18:33, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Is this a joke nom? Part of what hat arguably been the most popular comedy group in Denmark in the last 30 years. Doing a tour with 300,000 spectators is comparable to a tour in the US with 18,000,000 spectators. Also done lots of other TV, movie and theater work. --Harthacnut (talk) 17:16, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 03:06, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The article exists on the danish wikipedia. I just don't see enough notability to include him here unless someone could possibly point out some reliable sources. Stubbleboy 06:37, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (t • c) 10:51, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - A nomination of this kind requires checking non-English sources properly before AfD. Even without knowledge of Danish a search on Linie 3 would produce material like this. I have added a stub for Linie 3 including ref showing they got into English Billboard back in 1981 the year of their first LP. In ictu oculi (talk) 04:35, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.