Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AndeZoo (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was IAR speedy delete with a sprinkling of salt. Author blocked as a promotion-only account. Blueboy96 17:48, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
AndeZoo[edit]
AfDs for this article:
- AndeZoo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
The article is just advertising without relevant content. There is no reference as to the product's notability. Most of the article (the Toy Biographies section) has been taken straight from the manufacturing company's website (see "andezoo's llama pets" at http://www.andezoo.com/. The article was created by a single-purpose account (User:Andezoo) and has already been deleted before for these same reasons, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andezoo. Victor12 (talk) 14:37, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Google web search turns up no substantial coverage in reliable secondary sources; absolutely nothing via News, Books, and Scholar. Fails WP:N. I'm off to delete the copyvio from the article, which won't leave much there. Deor (talk) 16:10, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.