Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anchorage Capital Partners

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 07:12, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Anchorage Capital Partners[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails NCORP--- all refs are about funding or mere notices about where they invested their money. DGG ( talk ) 10:19, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Business, Companies, and Australia. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:02, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, only trivial coverage found, fails WP:NCORP. SailingInABathTub (talk) 00:53, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, I don't quite get the argument around trivial coverage. Just now, I did a quick search and found two articles about the organisation on the Australian Financial Review website. For those who are not acquainted, the AFR is a major Australian newshead.

Apart from that, I was somehow familiar with the name of the organisation before I read the article, even though I didn't really know anything about the group. They seem to have some prominence, albiet locally Inchiquin (talk) 07:03, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Routine business announcements such as new partnerships and and product launches and other business deals are considered trivial because they occur for every business. SailingInABathTub (talk) 09:59, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete coverage is mainly routine or 1 line mentions. Not enough to meet WP:NCORP. LibStar (talk) 22:17, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is a company/organization therefore NCORP guidelines apply. WP:NCORP requires multiple sources (at least two) of deep or significant coverage with in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing "Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. So regurgitated "news" that relies entirely on company announcement or quotes/interviews are no Independent. None of the references in the article meet the criteria and I can't find any, topic fails WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 14:42, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.