Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anaya Music

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Joe (talk) 15:21, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Anaya Music[edit]

Anaya Music (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Autobio of non notable individual. Awards are not major. Lacks citations for WP:PROF. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Search found nothing good for gng. Blogs, self published. Prod removed amongst multiple edits that claimed to be adding references but never did. duffbeerforme (talk) 08:17, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. ~~ OxonAlex - talk 08:35, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. ~~ OxonAlex - talk 08:35, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 11:53, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Joe (talk) 16:14, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Keep Weak Delete and Blow It Up - After some rather extensive searching it appears that she may have enough for a stub article on her music, thanks to some notice in the Brazilian press and various publications in the religious/new age fields. Here are some possibilities: [1], [2], [3], [4]. But note that her other endeavors, particularly books, seem to have gone unnoticed and do not deserve to be discussed here. Overall, the article is in hideous shape and needs to be cleaned up severely, TNT'ed even, and reduced to a much shorter and more focused description of her scattered musical achievements over the years. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 17:59, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
User:Doomsdayer520. Contemporary Fusion Reviews is a self published site of Dick Metcalf who takes money for reviews [5]. The JW Vibe is a self published site of Johathan Widran, a PR writer [6] who takes money for reviews [7]. Mainly Piano a self published site of Kathy Parson. Last is mostly by her, not independent coverage. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:26, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Those aren't the only things I found, just some examples. She comes up in lists of new age/religious musicians in various books from those fields, but you are correct that most online sources aren't too reliable. I changed my vote to "Weak Delete" due to the scant nature of the sources, and if the article happens to survive I will fix it myself. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 14:41, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.