Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anatoly Shalyto
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. CitiCat ♫ 23:16, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Anatoly Shalyto[edit]
- Anatoly Shalyto (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Procedural nom. Was nominated for speedy, but I feel the article does assert some importance. However, this is not my field, and I can't state whether or not this person's achievements warrant an article. There appears to be concern that this is a vanity article for a non-notable person. I have no opinion. faithless (speak) 19:52, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:27, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Certainly was absurd as a speedy, since it said he is head of a dept at one of the major Russian Technological universities. What it needs is rewriting by someone who knows the subject well enough to reword the Russian qualifications into proper English. DGG (talk) 00:49, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 16:05, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Article was rewritten and cut. Pavel.mavrin (talk) 08:43, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Looks ok. Not notable outside his field(?), but I think the spirit of afd is to remove the hoaxes, spammers and popcruft trivia from wikipedia. Russian academics can have more latitude from me. Llamasharmafarmerdrama (talk) 21:29, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.