Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anastasis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete  (aeropagitica)  17:13, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

Anastasis

As mentioned in the article and associated talk page, this is completely unfounded terminology which does not appear in any medical or online resource or publication in the scientific literature. Alsorises 04:22, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:V and WP:NEO --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 04:45, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to Resurrection of Jesus or disambiguate. This unfamiliar word may have some currency, especially in Eastern Orthodox church, as a theological word for the resurrection of Jesus or the general resurrection of the dead. Smerdis of Tlön 15:26, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Somebody's using Wikipedia to promote a neologism. Brian G. Crawford 17:32, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - Google book search shows no hits for Anastasis and radiation together. Anastasis appears to have other meanings including the resurrection, or some part of a church. If someone wants to make a new page with this title, as a redirect or an article, on a legitimate topic like this, then of course that's cool. (There's the additional problem that this incorrect use of anastasis will remain out in cyberspace on sites that have copied the article from Wikipedia... oh well...) --Singkong2005 14:04, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete The article outright admits it's not verifiable.George Bluth 16:33, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.