Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anarchy Chess

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 13:08, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anarchy Chess[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is basically about a subreddit. Entirely non-notable and no reliable sources. MaxBrowne2 (talk) 10:10, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Concur. "Article" is also nonsensical. --IHTS (talk) 10:23, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not seeing any kind sourcing out there to support WP:GNG. This doesn't even seem worth a mention in the Chess article. WikiVirusC^(talk) 12:49, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Non-notable chess variant. The only sources present in the article are all just from Reddit, and searching for additional sources turns up no coverage in reliable sources. Rorshacma (talk) 17:21, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - obviously I'm going to say that as the nominator but I should really have speedied it for G1 (patent nonsense). Reviewing this editor's history, it's hard to AGF. I think an admin needs to have a look and decide if a block/ban is appropriate. MaxBrowne2 (talk) 04:38, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:49, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.