Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anand Ahuja

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nthep (talk) 13:32, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Anand Ahuja[edit]

Anand Ahuja (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability is not inherited, his fiancé may be notable but that does not extend to him. The sources in the article aren't focused on him alone, but always in the context of his fiancé. Nothing supports notability independently. Ravensfire (talk) 22:07, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete non-notable businessman who fails WP:ANYBIO. Also lacking a credible claim to significant that is not inherited WP:NOTINHERITED from his family or fiancee.--SamHolt6 (talk) 22:32, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 09:07, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 09:07, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I proposed deletion earlier, but it was removed. Natureium (talk) 19:17, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Meets the notability criteria to get verified HeyLetgoletgo (talk) 20:50, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note HeyLetgoletgo is the article's creator.--SamHolt6 (talk) 20:56, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete verification is not enough to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:48, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Hello, Admin. I've added all the right citations which refers to him alone and got rid of all the errors. So kindly check and do not delete the page in a haste. Yes, the previous urls were linking him to his fiancee only, which is why I got rid of many. So please do check and reject the idea of speedy deletion. And one more thing, I think instead of the users suggesting it for deletion, they should work on improving the article, like I have. Improving an article, is much better then considering it for deletion. Thank You! --Princessruby (talk) 06:46, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - the existing sources are either about him as a fiancé or relative of a notable person (WP:NOTINHERITED), or primary sources including press releases (WP:PRIMARY). Attempts to pad the article with trivia don't make a convincing case for notability. --bonadea contributions talk 07:55, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect: Create a "personal life" section at Sonam Kapoor and redirect "Anand Ahuja" to that section. This is because they are set to marry tomorrow. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:15, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Per nominator. Redirecting a BLP to another BLP is a terrible practice. ~ Winged BladesGodric 09:51, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.