Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Analicia Chaves
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Rlendog (talk) 01:54, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Analicia Chaves[edit]
- Analicia Chaves (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A model. She has appeared in some music videos and was in the Top 50 in a season of America's Next Top Model. Article lists a reference of an interview of her. Seeing a PR piece pushed out to websites containing the same photos and a few sentences about her. I'm just not finding any information about her in reliable source. Prod was contested on unknown grounds. Bgwhite (talk) 18:29, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The article says 'amateur', and please see Hip hop model too. Coupled with Bgwhite's nom, this says to me publicity campaign for a current wannabe. Good luck to her, but it's a tough business... Peridon (talk) 18:53, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No coverage in reliable sources -- Whpq (talk) 16:37, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: lacks the depth of independent coverage required. Arguably enough of the interview-type things would suffice, but that seems to be the only worthwhile one. (Some standard accounts/vote things on other sites; nothing that goes to anything more than the cattle-market approach.) Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 10:39, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.