Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anais Zanotti

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:11, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Anais Zanotti[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One source is her own website and one source is a forum. You’re hard pressed to find anything else.... Trillfendi (talk) 22:42, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:28, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:28, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:29, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:29, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:30, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:30, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment My search found lots of ghits and pictures, but I didn't see significant coverage to show WP:GNG is met. The number of hits implies popularity, but not necessarily WP notability. Papaursa (talk) 00:07, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A deeper search by me still found nothing that meets WP:GNG. Papaursa (talk) 22:50, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Article makes no claim of anything notable. Both sources are WP:PRIMARY. A quick Google search does not show WP:SIGCOV in WP:RS. Does not satisfy WP:GNG or WP:NBIO. -Lopifalko (talk) 06:32, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - does not meet WP:BASIC (has not "received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other") or WP:ANYBIO (no "well-known and significant award or honor" & has not "made a widely recognized contribution") - therefore delete - Epinoia (talk) 21:42, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.