Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anahí promotional singles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Mi Delirio#Singles. Redirect all joe decker ^{talk to me} 14:10, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Anahí promotional singles[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. "Promotional singles" that have zero notability, failing the requirements for independent articles per WP:NSONGS. Attempts to redirect were reverted, but there is nothing in these articles that really even warrant a redirect as they total lack content and reliable sources to merge. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 21:04, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Borrar (that means delete) since there's nothing worth redirecting and the lack of sourcing means they fail WP:NSONGS. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 22:05, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:51, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect all to Mi Delirio#Singles -- Whpq (talk) 19:43, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG. Stuartyeates (talk) 03:17, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter (talk) 16:00, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete all~~. Redirect all. The articles contain practically no content and do not seem to satisfy the conditions set out at WP:GNG. Super Mario Man 15:31, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Is there any reason why those !voting for deletion are not in favour of redirecting? Per WP:NSONG, when the song is not notable enough for its own article, it "should redirect to another relevant article". -- Whpq (talk) 17:27, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly, I'm perfectly happy to change my !vote here. The overall effect is more or less the same. Super Mario Man 14:00, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Either way, this discussion should have been relisted or closed by now. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 18:53, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've made a request for closure or relisting here. Super Mario Man 14:03, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.