Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anabel Barnston (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 16:16, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Anabel Barnston[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Actress possibly fails WP:NACTRESS Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 00:58, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 00:58, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 00:58, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 00:58, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:13, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep: Based on WP:NACTOR, I think the subject just scrapes through. Her significant role in Coming of Age, her role in the film, The Zombie King, and her recurring parts in other TV series are enough, in my opinion. Dflaw4 (talk) 12:22, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:04, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete The sourcing just doesn't seem to be there, it's all extremely trivial, and I'm not sure how notable her roles are. Maybe they are, but they don't seem to be. Or else, there should be more/better quality coverage of her. That said, I'll change my vote if sourcing is improved enough to meet the notability standards. There only seems to be three hits for her on Google News. So, I'm expecting it to be. --Adamant1 (talk) 08:05, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: As it is now, notability has not been established. It's in the "grey" area, and my opinion is that if no additional references (with more than just passing mentions) are added to the article - whatever the reason may be - then Delete. Bezrat (talk) 15:27, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.