Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ana Garcia de Cuenca

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 14:09, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ana Garcia de Cuenca[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Dubiously notable. Three local refs, all deadlinks. I didn't find anything better on a BEFORE search. Article is full of sketchy assertions of Nobel Prize nominations and prophecies from god, none of it verified.

This is a translation of the Spanish Wikipedia article, which amusingly is tagged as being written "from a fanatic's point of view". Couldn't agree more. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 07:01, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. TMG^talk 07:46, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. TMG^talk 07:46, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. TMG^talk 07:46, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There is a total lack of sources that are reliable 3rd party ones that show that her actions actually had an impact.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:14, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yunshui ^雲 _水 09:40, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per ;PMC lacks independent sources fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 08:15, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.