Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amy Borkowsky

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. The article shows potential but the nomination page has lacked participation. (non-admin closure) Ya sh ! 00:20, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Amy Borkowsky[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I've actually encountered this article quite a few times and am still questionable of its better notability and improvemetn as the best I found was this, this and this and this has not improved since starting in January 2009. SwisterTwister talk 07:10, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:11, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:11, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:11, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Author of two books: Amy's Answering Machine: Messages from Mom and Statements: True Tales of Life, Love, and Credit Card Bills. Additionally, the secondary source coverage shown at Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL would be enough, over time, to perform a Quality improvement project on this article and take it to WP:GA status. — Cirt (talk) 23:55, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, before anyone else makes the steps, I'm willing to improve it if it can actually be. SwisterTwister talk 00:12, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 18:13, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:58, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.