Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amritnath Ashram
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 06:26, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Amritnath Ashram[edit]
- Amritnath Ashram (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non notable ashram. No reliable sources show this ashram to be notable. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 21:15, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. —Ism schism (talk) 21:18, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. —Ism schism (talk) 21:18, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —Ism schism (talk) 21:18, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - find sources and expand. Or it may be merged to International_Nath_Order as it seems to be related. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 01:34, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Keep for what? There is no reason and specifically no notability. Also, where are the reliable sources that merit an expansion? Please do explain your comments. Also, please share any reliable sources that show how this is directly related to the International Nath Order. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 02:16, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment It's not related to the International Nath Order and should not be merged with it. If anything, it should be merged to Nath. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 32.97.110.55 (talk) 21:37, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Keep for what? There is no reason and specifically no notability. Also, where are the reliable sources that merit an expansion? Please do explain your comments. Also, please share any reliable sources that show how this is directly related to the International Nath Order. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 02:16, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No notability, no reliable sources and no clear place to merge. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 00:47, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 20:55, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Does having its own cows count as notability? ChildofMidnight (talk) 23:38, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.