Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amrinder Goraya

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 20:51, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Amrinder Goraya[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Auto-biography of a non-notable director with a single, non-notable film credit to his name. No sources in the article at all, and my own search turns up absolutely nothing except a few social media hits. Clearly fails WP:GNG. Probably A7-able but you could argue there's some kind of claim of importance made, so bringing it here to be safe. Hug^syrup 12:21, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Hug^syrup 12:21, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete under A7, bio with no credible claim of significance. I wouldn't call the number of music videos, his status as an assistant director, or the "rare privilege of directing so-and-so", nor being an assistant director a CCS. If we don't go with the speedy, delete anyway as non-notable autobiography. creffett (talk) 23:22, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Created by subject of article, originally autobiographical. No real significance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FriendlyCaribou (talk • contribs)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 13:53, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable filmmaker.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:35, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete. A7 is perhaps not applicable as there is a credible claim for notability, but G11 (promotional) certainly applies. --Randykitty (talk) 10:10, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
speedy delete: A7 doesnt apply, and G11 is borderline too. But this discussion can certainly be closed as snowball. —usernamekiran (talk) 16:45, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

now User:AmrinderGoraya has added a lot to the article. Given no evidence/verifiability A7, and G11 can be applied. But I think we should let the AfD run its duration, so that we later can speedy delete the recreations. —usernamekiran (talk) 16:54, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.