Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amos Crawley (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Another day, another G5. Drmies (talk) 14:43, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Amos Crawley[edit]

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not meeting ACTOR or GNG. No sourcing found, Behind the Voice actors, then tv tropes and Fandom, then it peters off. Oaktree b (talk) 22:59, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Oaktree b (talk) 22:59, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I'd have gone G4 on this one (no criticism implied). Minor roles, minor productions, sourcing problematic, much as before. Fails WP:GNG. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 09:00, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete, from what I remember of the first time round (vague), I think G4 applies - there's exactly one new datum on here (the 2022-2023 role). --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 09:30, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:42, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. As the first time, the notability of an actor does not reside in the list of his roles per se, it resides in the quality and depth of reliable source coverage about him and his roles that he does or doesn't have in media and/or books. But the references here aren't reliable or notability-building sources at all, and even on a ProQuest search for older coverage that might not have Googled I still just get glancing namechecks of his existence as a cast member in stuff rather than notability-building coverage about him. Bearcat (talk) 20:20, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.