Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amnon Jackont

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Mailer Diablo 11:29, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Amnon Jackont[edit]

Only 528 results in Google[1], not notable enough. Useless article.

Delete --Haham hanuka 09:03, 31 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep An extremely well-known Israeli author and literary editor with over 600 hits on Google [2], appears in the Lexicon for New Israeli Literature [3], the Institute for translated Israeli literary authors [4] and has an article on the Hebrew Wikipedia, written by prime contributors of that project [5]— Preceding unsigned comment added by Gidonb (talk • contribs) Thank you Alhutch, I did forget to sign. gidonb 16:04, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- It's still less than 1000. --Haham hanuka 18:37, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - 1000 seems fairly arbitrary. For a local figure, 600 may be plenty. Wikipedia:Google says taht Google may be used as a test of whether a term is in use, or whether something is verifiable, but even then is dubious. For notability, I would not use Google as a measure unless someone's claimed notability was in the online world, where I would surely expect sufficient reference. The only accepted criterion for authors is found at WP:BIO. jnothman ^talk 23:50, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    - Thank you for your explanation. I now get over 900 hits. [6]. This user frequently tries to remove information. gidonb 12:53, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- This is not a speedy keep. A speedy keep can only arise when there are no other votes to delete and a nomination was either withdrawn, vandalistic, or clearly disruptive. Please try another vote. Stifle 22:05, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - Stifle, I support continuing the regular procedure as you suggest and as it developed. That said, I see this nomination as clearly disruptive. The nominator, who is indefinitely banned from the Hebrew Wikipedia, can read in Hebrew that Jackont has an extensive article at he.wikipedia and is a notable and in fact a multiple times bestselling author and television personality. By luck I found out that so much creative work was about to get lost (edits started elsewhere; there was an error with the article movement). Regards, gidonb 22:32, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep appears to be a notable person.--Alhutch 16:07, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, this author is also something of a hero for exposing serious crime in Israel, see Amnon Jackont#Trojan horse exposure, so why pick on him? I just don't get it. IZAK 16:30, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: appears to pass WP:BIO both by criterion as an author (presumably) and by reknown through newsworthy events. jnothman ^talk 23:50, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. —Crypticbot (operator) 04:35, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per Gidonb and reference as per his illustrations. What we are looking for reliable sources to meet our verifiability policy which have been supplied above. Capitalistroadster 00:29, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.