Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amit Bagaria

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 17:32, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Amit Bagaria[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:N and is mostly written as a promotional piece. 40% of the sources are primary. --Chris (talk) 17:34, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. --Chris (talk) 17:34, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. --Chris (talk) 17:34, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:25, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DELETE IT SHOULD BE CLEARLY DELETED BECAUSE IT IS PROBABLY A PROMOTIONAL PIECE AND NO RELIABLE NEWS SOURCES CITED. I WOULD SUGGEST DELETION AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. Stud0708 (talk) 20:17, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- "As soon as possible" is a little alarmist. There is no rush. AfD discussions are typically kept open for a week. --Chris (talk) 21:09, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete another of way too many articles on non-notable businessmen. Wikipedia is being abused as a form of LinkedIn, this has to stop.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:33, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.