Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amirah Kassem

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:57, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Amirah Kassem[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clear example of WP: BLP1E and WP: NOT. Admiral Caius (talk) 21:35, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:00, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:00, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:00, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:00, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Operating an upscale bakery and receiving significant coverage for that from reliable, independent sources is not "one event". And where is it written that Wikipedia should "not" have articles about notable pasty chefs? I don't see that in the furnished link. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 03:31, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Multiple notable events there. Clear example of a notable professional who gets profiles for the multiple instances of notable professional work they have done. If this is WP:BLP1E so is every professional wp:ATHLETE Neonchameleon (talk) 12:53, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:45, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep I do not think that the first few articles cited do much to establish notability, because the websites seem to be written in a blog/news format, and those types of sources are more likely to report on non-notable persons or things as human interest pieces. The Vogue article, however, was enough to establish notability for me in combination with the other two. I'm not particularly sure every pastry chef that gets a human interest piece written about them on an online news source is notable, but this one seems to have gotten enough attention to meet the threshold. TonyBallioni (talk) 19:53, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.