Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amir Windom
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:56, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Amir Windom[edit]
- Amir Windom (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No major/notable awards or notable positions; only IMDB listing is "music supervisor" for one short. Article appears to be written by subject. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:32, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The article is mostly important-sounding text that doesn't really bestow notability on Amir Windom. One example is right there in the beginning: he went to the same school with two famous people. Then he worked with two famous labels. He's friends with Kevin Liles... seems to me that this guy's got good connections but no notability. Zakhalesh (talk) 18:42, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete old-style vanity article for a person whose career, to put it as kindly as possible, has been less than spectacular (the IMDB link being especially telling) Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 18:43, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I see nothing here that meets WP:GNG criteria for inclusion. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:42, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:47, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:47, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.