Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amir Jordan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TonyBallioni (talk) 15:46, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Amir Jordan[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable wrestler Galatz גאליץ ^{שיחה Talk} 10:57, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. Galatz גאליץ ^{שיחה Talk} 10:57, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:34, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:34, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:34, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wait/weak delete: There seem to be a reasonable number of sources available for the subject of the article. Clearly the article itself needs a stylistic clear-up and a few more citations: it was only created three days ago, and I think it'd be unfair to delete it until such a clear-up has occurred, so that it's clearer to assess the number of sources and information available on the subject. I suppose the guideline that this hinges on is WP:ENTERTAINER. If the sources can demonstrate a large enough following, then fine. But my instinct is they probably won't. MB190417 (talk) 13:27, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not finding enough reliable sources to support inclusion. JTP ^{(talk • contribs)} 03:14, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Siddiqsazzad001 <Talk/> 13:50, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - doesn't meet WP:GNG. Available sources are primary or WP:ROUTINE. Nikki♥311 21:16, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.