Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amir Atif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 12:12, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Amir Atif[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disputed move to Draft space. Moved by a different editor to mainspace with no improvement shortly after being draftified by Robertsky. The issues remain. Normally I would draftify this, but doing so now would be move warring without full community consensus. Fails WP:NAUTHOR, Is currently WP:ADMASQ, likely to be a translation of an article that I cannot find from an Arabic language Wikipedia, and not attributed as a translation currently. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 08:20, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 08:20, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 08:20, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 08:20, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Inadequate sourcing to meet notability for WP: GNG. Unreliable and not independent. I am concerned with tone as well, clear case of WP:ADMASQ. NiklausGerard (talk) 06:00, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Lack of WP:SIGCOV. Fails WP:GNG. Jeni Wolf (talk) 06:36, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.