Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amigos Worldwide

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 13:15, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Amigos Worldwide[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company, has all signs of UDP, most of the content was uploaded in one go, Lacks RS, Fails WP:GNG. Meeanaya (talk) 05:56, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What counts as a 'notable company'? Upon creating I followed other examples of Wikipedia pages of non-profit companies. I thought editing in one go was advised by Wikipedia as I recall being encouraged by various blog posts to have something ready to upload and to have practiced editing other articles. The article yes will lack reliable sources as it is a work in progress, I thought getting the skeleton of the article down was wise and then to come back to the resources. --Angelli.badillo (talk) 09:12, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment @Angelli.badillo: See WP:NCORP and WP:GNG. Moaz786 (talk to me or see what I've been doing) 21:13, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:50, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:50, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Uganda-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:50, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the coverage is very weak.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 14:44, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.