Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amice of Valois

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:V cannot be overridden by consensus. There are no sources for this person's existence, and "Amice de Valois" (i.e., what would be her French name) gives a single Google hit from a wiki. If anyone wants to merge this content once there is a source for it, it is reproduced below in its entirety. Sandstein 06:43, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Amice of Valois was an illegitimate daughter of King Louis VII of France and an unknown woman. She was the cousin of Isabella of Valois.

Amice of Valois[edit]

One-line stub, created by anon 2 years ago. IMHO, this Amice of Valois is not notable. Kmorozov 11:22, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Article itself says she is an "unknown woman" so she doesn't seem notable. Thaurisil 12:49, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge - If it is true, merge to Louis VII of France. A list of illegitimate daughters of an important king is encyclopedic, but don't need a own article. Cate |_Talk 15:15, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The fact that her name is remembered some nine hundred years after she lived speaks of encyclopedic stature, even if little more can be said about her beyond what's already here. - Smerdis of Tlön 18:00, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge her name into the articles on her father and cousin, who are mentioned in the one sentence article, if this hasn't been done already and then delete. While I normally tend to agree with Smerdis of Tlön's view when it comes to historical persons, this woman seems particularly non-notable. The article even states that she is an "unknown woman," which I take to mean that the only known info on her is her relationship to the two individuals mentioned in the article. This can't go beyond a one or two-sentence stub if this is actually the case. --The Way 05:52, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I think a merge without delete is better (i.e. the merge with redirect). The name seems not confuseable with new (and future) persons. Cate |_Talk 09:23, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Davidpdx
Merge any useful information then Delete -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 18:38, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.