Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ami Magazine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 21:35, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ami Magazine[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NOTABILITY. Brand-new magazine, no gnews hits, google hits are largely for similarly-named magazines ("Bon Ami Magazine", publications from organizations named A.M.I.). Hits that are for this magazine are help-wanted ads, a few blog posts, a couple forum discussions. Nat Gertler (talk) 14:41, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, Sadads (talk) 01:07, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:17, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - There are thousands of startup and little magazines across the world and other then WP:ITEXISTS it fails WP:N like many others. - Pmedema (talk) 04:49, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.