Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Top 40 Charts of June 2008
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 14:05, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
American Top 40 Charts of June 2008[edit]
- American Top 40 Charts of June 2008 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Not a useful list at all. One particular month from one particular chart? No sources and not very useful. Wolfer68 (talk) 02:54, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This can probably be speedied as a copyvio of Mediabase 24/7's information. It's not even one month, it's one week! Nate • (chatter) 06:48, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete (speedily if possible) This is material best covered by linking to an off-site database. Otherwise, we'd set precedent for creation of hundreds of articles that are basically a copyright violation of the site mentioned. While there is no creativity involved in the listing, there is significant work involved in creating the listing to begin with, which means it's copyright protected. - Mgm|(talk) 10:10, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This would have been speedied back in August, but someone who wasn't involved with the article removed the ProD with the statement "I don't like the article, it need not be deleted." Even the creator of the article did not attempt to create another one. Mandsford (talk) 14:27, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as Wikipedia:Listcruft --ThaddeusB (talk) 18:05, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete — Wikipedia is not a weekly music chart; information can easily be obtained through the proper sites (Mediabase 24/7, Billboard, etc.) and each site's archives; I do not believe that Wikipedia is the place for this, however. [[Briguy52748 (talk) 19:13, 13 January 2009 (UTC)]][reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.