Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Sleep Association

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2018 October 18.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:36, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

American Sleep Association[edit]

Article fails WP:NOTABILITY, WP:CORP, WP:COI. Nothing found in google news. Article was created by an WP:SPA account with no other edits other than related to sleepassociation.org. Was speedied previously. Other related Sleep association

see also Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Spam#http:.2F.2Fspam.sleepassociation.org Hu12 15:30, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Couldn't find in-depth coverage from secondary sources. And that could be because there isn't any. I also sense some self-promotion here because the user who created this immediately added an external link to the website in another article. Spellcast 15:51, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Appears to be a cheap imitation of the real US professional associations in this field, which seem to be American Academy of Sleep Medicine and http://www.sleepresearchsociety.org/.--orlady 17:57, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per all of the above, orlady's comment. --A. B. ^(talk) 18:06, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Give it a rest per above Mandsford 19:34, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sigh... ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 22:12, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as there are no secondary sources to write an article with. ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 22:12, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Red flags galore: No id of physicians/scientists founders, or indication of existence prior to 6/07 private domain reg, no mention/listings on similar resource listings at sleepfoundation.org, sleepnet, etc., generic articles written by MDs whose only search results bring up nada or free article sites, thin actual content with "abstracts" or "events" sections bringing up framed pages from other websites, or promised benefit from joining the association. If overkill, I apologize -- there is a growing number of legitimate associations dealing with sleep medicine, but this one isn't one of them and likely won't be. Flowanda | Talk 22:49, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom., and others.--JayJasper 13:04, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete agreed with Hu12, no reliable sources to assert notability. Carlosguitar 20:54, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.