Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Dental Hygienists' Association

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 14:32, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

American Dental Hygienists' Association[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Brought to my attention via Wikipedia:Help_desk#Page_declined. Fails WP:NORG: the only third-party mentions I found online are passing mentions, usually a journalist getting the ADHA to give its opinion for a dentist-focused story. Note that this book with a promising title (given in the "further reading" section) has the ADHA as its publisher, hence it is WP:SPS. Tigraan^{Click here to contact me} 10:55, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 11:46, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 11:46, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 11:46, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 11:47, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Normally I would think that a national professional association in the U.S. would be notable enough to satisfy WP:ORG, but this article is lacking in independent sources. If better sources could be found, I would probably recommend "keep". --Metropolitan90 (talk) 16:14, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep The organization is discussed to an extent that I would consider SIGCOV in several dental hygiene textbooks, e.g. Dentistry, Dental Practice, and the Community (pp. 9-10), Dental Hygiene: Theory and Practice (p. 9). Not an amazing level of coverage but medical professional organizations such as these do have some inherent notability IMO as they have influence over research and policy at a national level. Spicy (talk) 18:00, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep per Spicy. seems like some minimal content can be sourced.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 23:40, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Hygenists dont get much coverage. This seems to have sufficient notice. Rathfelder (talk) 22:15, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep- as the org. does have wp:sigcov atleast significant enough to allow this page to be kept. Dtt1^Talk 14:05, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.