Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Association of Individual Investors

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 06:56, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

American Association of Individual Investors[edit]

Apparently a non-notable "association" of investors. For what it's worth, I've received 5 invitations to join (for free) in the past week, so that even an audited membership count would be of questionable validity, and I see no evidence of that on the web. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 19:38, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

keep provided that the references are put in before the end of the AfD. Adding them promptly helps the later comers to the discussion. DGG 01:00, 3 June 2007 (UTC)delete unsourced commercial claims, but not spammy enough for a clear-cut speedy. DGG 19:45, 1 June 2007 (UTC)DGG 01:00, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Lots of references in the New York Times. See http://www.google.com/search?q=%22American+Association+of+Individual+Investors%22+site%3Anytimes.com --Eastmain 20:12, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This is a notable organization, frequently cited in market reports. The membership is surveyed about trends and news events, so they keep their name out there. 40 results in current Google News. I have no idea what its members think of the group, but the AARP is a pretty similar organization and they won't let go of somebody's mailing address until you sign up. --Dhartung | Talk 21:25, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Dhartung. — Madman bum and angel (talk – desk) 22:45, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep. Selected by Forbes for "best of the web" list.[1] --Nricardo 22:33, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Conditional withdraw if references are included, per DGG. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 21:07, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep will add a reference or two from a third party source. -Chantoke 02:01, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.