Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amelyn Veloso

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR) (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:06, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Amelyn Veloso[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Keeps on getting the info changed as well as the prod removed so this is the next step-not sure how notable they are either. Wgolf (talk) 01:14, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent|lambast 01:37, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:06, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:06, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:06, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Seems to be sufficient coverage to meet GNG. "Keeps on getting the info changed" and "prod removed" are not deletion reasons. If you are "not sure how notable they are" you are expected to exercise a little diligence yourself, per WP:BEFORE. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 15:30, 30 September 2014 (UTC).

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, → Call me Hahc21 01:45, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 02:33, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.