Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amelia Morris

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. plicit 23:37, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Amelia Morris[edit]

Amelia Morris (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Searches of "Amelia Morris" and "Amelia Stanislas" did not come back with any clear examples of significant coverage. Mentioned in TWG and Gameday but neither of those would count as anything other than a passing mention. I can't find any evidence of WP:GNG. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 23:25, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 23:25, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 23:25, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 23:25, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 23:25, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 23:26, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 08:03, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete As per nom fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. CeltJungleSnake (talk) 08:10, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Question - I don't see "Amelia Stanislas" mentioned in the article. Where'd you get that? Hmlarson (talk) 16:06, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
She is mentioned under both surnames at TWG but it's only a passing mention so no WP:SIGCOV Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:39, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - This is where contextual awareness comes into play. How many referees are women in the men's game? Is that what this is really about? Hmlarson (talk) 19:45, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This article was created by editor Hack in 2009 and has existed here for over 10 years. Why the need to delete now? Hmlarson (talk) 19:46, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If she gained a lot of significant coverage for her role, like Sian Massey-Ellis for example, then the article should be kept. I see no reason to keep the article purely on the basis of being a female assistant referee in a male-dominated role. By that logic, should we create articles on every female bricklayer or every male midwife regardless of level of depth of coverage? Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:43, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Also WP:LONGTIME is listed as an argument to avoid in AfD. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:44, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.