Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amelia Kroger Main Street Marketplace

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:27, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Amelia Kroger Main Street Marketplace[edit]

Amelia Kroger Main Street Marketplace (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Originally proposed for deletion by another editor, and I endorsed. It was contested without giving a reason by an IP. This is a non-notable grocery store that fails WP:GNG. There isn't really that much more to say. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:33, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. I am the editor who originally proposed deletion - I wanted it to be speedied but couldn't justify it under the regular criteria. There's just nothing notable about this and it borders on being spam. PKT(alk) 03:09, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete Not even vaguely plausibly notable. Mangoe (talk) 03:25, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Non-notable firm, failing WP:CORPDEPTH; the text - noting the non-encyclopaedic "we" - can be regarded as advertising. AllyD (talk) 09:41, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:10, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:10, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - I appreciate the editor's contributions but Wikipedia is not a business directory for every shopping center out there. It may help if it was locally notable, but even then it probably wouldn't be enough. Google News searches found links here, here and here. It's your usual shopping center. SwisterTwister talk 19:00, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.