Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ameer Bukhari

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  11:30, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ameer Bukhari[edit]

Ameer Bukhari (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:GNG He was dead and had nothing to do with anything!!!!!!!! Petebutt (talk) 07:59, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Nordic Dragon 08:54, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Saudi Arabia-related deletion discussions. Nordic Dragon 08:54, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per WP:1E. His death in a plane crash is a classic case of NOTNEWS, to start. His role in 9/11 was nonexistent, and he was initially suspected but soon cleared. Cue apologies by news media. There is no long-lasting significance of this footnote to the 9/11 investigations, even if this minor incident did get a few news stories. If it must be kept, perhaps combine it with Adnan Bukhari and rename it, or find some other page on the 9/11 aftermath or investigations to which we could merge a few sentences' worth of the articles. GABHello! 21:19, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 11:08, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Per WP:NOTNEWS, WP:1E. Perhaps reference the confusion in articles related to 9/11 suspects/investigations AusLondonder (talk) 17:22, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - probably could have been CSD'd, absolutely no notability. Onel5969 TT me 19:34, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.