Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ambulatory Healthcare Services

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 11:36, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ambulatory Healthcare Services[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I was actually going to speedy and my searches found nothing better than this and this, this and this but, in case it was notable in Abu Dhabi, I nominated it instead. SwisterTwister talk 06:12, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:26, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:26, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:26, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:23, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:23, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I waited to see if there would be any contributions from someone with more knowledge of the middle-east. My searches turned up nothing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:34, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 19:29, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Copyvio of a few websites. I found plagiarism and misrepresentation of [1] and [2], to name two. The figures from the second link have been distorted. I am also doubtful over whether this is a notable topic. SEHA would probably be notable but AHS is murky. Elspamo4 (talk) 18:45, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.