Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ambuja Cements

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Going to go ahead and close this one based on keeps and consensus. If anyone feels concerned and wants this to play out for the full week, let me know. Missvain (talk) 22:06, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ambuja Cements[edit]

Ambuja Cements (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

does not seem to meet current requirements for NCORP DGG ( talk ) 07:10, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:13, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:13, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong Keep: One of the largest cement companies in India with a market capitalisation of $6 billion. Clearly passes WP:SIRS as it sees regular coverage in multiple reliable and independent secondary sources as demonstrated here:
    [1]
    [2]
    [3]
    [4]
    [5]
    [6]
    [7]
    Most if not all of the above mentioned sources pass WP:ORGDEPTH. Company is certainly notable, the article however, is poorly written and needs expansion. For now, certain maintenance templates can be added but the article should definitely be kept. Prolix 💬 08:47, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: I found a fair amount of coverage from multiple good sources (MoneyControl, Economic Times, BloombergQuint, etc.) without running an exhaustive search on Google. This is paywalled but looks like sigcov and this is also a good source in my opinion. There's much more there on Google, so far as I found. Passes WP:GNG and WP:NCORP IMO. JavaHurricane 08:51, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Definitely passes WP:NCORP with the some of the sources provided by Prolix. Pahunkat (talk) 10:23, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep One of the leading cement companies in India. Meets WP:NCORP without a shadow of a doubt. RationalPuff (talk) 11:26, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.