Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ambika Jk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Those who posit that there is "lots of news" and "meets GNG" need to demonstrate that there are indeed independent, reliable sources available. Those arguing for "delete" detail their reasoning in a clear manner, therefore the consensus is "delete" by strength of argument. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 15:38, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ambika Jk[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Simply fails WP:GNG, WP:NACTOR, and WP:NAUTHOR. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:34, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:34, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:57, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep :Because She is a well known writer,Social media activist and serial actress in Kerala,There is a lot of news about Ambika. Padavalam Kuttan Pilla Talk 11:35, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 You can check the IMDB link along with it 
* https://www.imdb.com/name/nm9776137/
* https://keralabookstore.com/book/nizhalikalillathaval/13861/

Keep Notable. Passes WP:GNG and WP:AUTHOR. -- Harshil ^{want to talk?} 14:49, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: A pseudo - (false or deceiving) BLP. The first source I checked (An affair to remember [2009]) presented me with "Ambika Soni", currently Union minister, to New Delhi" married to globetrotting diplomatic husband Uday. I read the entire source and have no idea who the hell Ambika Soni or Uday is? The stage is now set that I would have to explore if there is a mistake (wrong person) or a deception, and this defeats the entire concept of an encyclopedia. The author of this article and those presenting that the subject is "well known" and "notable" would be advised that the proof of these assertions would be evidenced by reliable, accurate sources. This becomes far more important when another editor's search is hindered by a language obstacle when having to dig and poke around to find such proof. Alright, even though confused I looked at Vishnu Puran ("Television" subsection) since a "keep" above presented: "a well known writer, Social media activist and serial actress in Kerala, There is a lot of news about Ambika." (the lead of the article shows "Malayalam Television Supporting actress"), and of all the names presented there was nothing in the lead about "Ambika Jk" or "Ambika Soni". The name is mentioned in the cast section (number 27); "Ambika Jk as Gopika", so I figured I must have "missed it", but being just a cast member or having bit-parts and passing mention in sources does not advance notability. --- Otr500 (talk)

- Conclusion: Readers of an encyclopedia need to be presented with factual information. Other editors are not required to I have expended a lot (above evidence) of time and effort to to try to "prove" notability exist as it should be evidenced by sources. If these are not on the article a "Before" (Usually performed "before" a nomination) should reasonably present evidence. If there are obstacles, such as language barrier issues or lack of international notability, then the burden would be on those wishing inclusion so "we" (Wikipedia) are not presenting inaccurate or false content. Also, Advertising IMBd as evidence does not help. It is generally considered unreliable so offers no "proof". Otr500 (talk) 11:33, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not meet notability guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:37, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I removed the source about An affair to remember, which was clearly not about this Ambika. I am not certain that the other sources all refer to one person, but the Ambika who has published a book in 2019, and, per IMDB, has written a script for one documentary that appeared in 2018 (her only credit on IMDB), is not yet notable. Other claimed appearances seem to have been uncredited, and not for significant roles. So WP:TOOSOON. RebeccaGreen (talk) 11:59, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.