Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amber awards

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:09, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Amber awards[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

restored after PROD deletion - No indication that these awards have received independent coverage outside press releases from organisers and winners. Fails WP:GNG Codf1977 (talk) 06:10, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I've found and added a major newspaper citation who ran a story about the winners last year - its from the Sydney Morning Herald. There was also a story in one of the two print advertising and media monthly magazines which i could chase in over the next week. And there's also media coverage emerging now for the 2nd Awards which are being announced on 16th September 2010. (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 15:13, 23 August 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Jujutacular ^talk 22:15, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- Jujutacular ^talk 22:15, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete, there's a lot of noise for it on Google, but most of it appears to be aggregators, press releases, and the like. Nothing that would indicate substantial interest from any third parties, as far as I can see. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 12:05, 23 August 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Lankiveil. Like most trade awards focused on a very specific industry, the only people who really seem to care are those who've actually won them. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 03:44, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I don't see how its notable. Perhaps in 10 years if it's still running, but a lot of these trade awards start up with good intentions, and die with lack of funding. scope_creep (talk) 19:23, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.