Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amber Scott (actress)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:56, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Amber Scott (actress)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails both WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. Had only one role of note, and nothing else. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 01:11, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. hmssolent\^{You rang?} _{ship's log} 02:16, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~ - Two IMDB pages are far from adequate to satisfy WP:NACTOR and WP:N. A search will reveal nothing particularly useful. hmssolent\^{You rang?} _{ship's log} 02:19, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In 1993, she did win (Ensemble) "Young Artist Award Outstanding Young Ensemble Cast in a Motion Picture for Hook (1991)" and was also nominated for "Best Young Actress Under Ten in a Motion Picture" for Hook (1991)".--Stemoc (talk) 03:48, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Those are very good claims of notability, but a number of independent, reliable sources with significant coverage of the subject would be necessary if the basic notability guidelines are to be passed. Changing to Reconsider pending additional sources. hmssolent\^{You rang?} _{ship's log} 05:15, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That award was for every child actor in the film, so I wouldn't say it establishes notability. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 14:31, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A win and a nomination, i'd say nominations is as good as a win and if you disagree, maybe you should start tagging article's for deletion where the person was nominated for an Oscar but didn't win it...--Stemoc (talk) 23:18, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A group win doesn't really establish notability since it was really more for the film, but that's only what I think. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 23:47, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. hmssolent\^{You rang?} _{ship's log} 02:19, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:OUTCOMES and WP:BLP. We have tended to delete BLPs of child actors with only minor roles. Bearian (talk) 20:53, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete That she was part of a cast that won an award does not make her notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:53, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 02:23, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 17:58, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.