Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amber Michaels

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:34, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Amber Michaels[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:PORNBIO and general notability guidelines. AVN nominations are scene awards which, through consensus, are disregarded in the consideration of notability. Morbidthoughts (talk) 06:05, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Morbidthoughts (talk) 06:14, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:05, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator's sound analysis. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 15:00, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, →B music ian 01:39, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:PORNBIO. Epbr123 (talk) 16:32, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable person. jni (talk) 20:54, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The non awards info is based on unreliable sourcing. The info comes from either a crowdsourced online dabase - or from interviews with the subject of the articles and are therefore promary sources.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.