Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amber Gristak

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:03, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Amber Gristak[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ineligible for PROD, was PROD'd in 2011 without a rationale.

Doesn't appear to meet WP:NAUTHOR or WP:NACTOR (roles are all extremely minor). Sources linked in article are mostly op-eds by the subject, so aren't indications of notability. The ones that aren't are hyper-local and fail WP:AUD. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:52, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:52, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:52, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:14, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:15, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:15, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I don't have much to add to the nom other than that this was the most notable source I could find about Gristak (also known as Adler). The entirety of prose is a two-sentence lead, then a bunch of 'Professional activities' completely devoid of any context. I'm legitimately on the fence about changing this to Speedy Delete per WP:A7. Comment: Reeks of COI. TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 07:08, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No evidence of notability in cited sources. Couldn't find anything better. ~Kvng (talk) 12:45, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 21:44, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete can't see much of a claim of significance, the acting roles are minor and worldcat has no entry for her as an author, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 21:07, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Unless someone can do a WP:HEY and add more content to justify notability, there isn't enough here at present. Montanabw^(talk) 19:46, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.