Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ambassadorial Brothers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. (non-admin closure) Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:06, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ambassadorial Brothers[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Each brother is notable by himself, but there is nothing, that suggests the brotherhood has something to do with notability. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 15:27, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethiopia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:29, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Even though they are referred to here [1]as "Three Ambassadorial Brothers", I must accept that the group wasn't widely known as the Ambassadorial Brothers. Each having a different separate page will due. As the creator I agree that the page should get deleted. -ChiefWanag, 19:29, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 11:04, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, I think we may be able to speed this along per WP:G7. I've tagged it accordingly with a link to this discussion, here. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:54, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.