Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amazoness series

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete all Proto||type 11:48, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Amazoness series[edit]

We don't need a ton of pages on all these YGH cards. It's useless, unencyclopedic and other than the most important (e.g. Dark Magician, Blue-Eyes), they all need to be deleted. Frenchman113 20:54, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also being listed are:

  • Delete them all. Yu-gi-cruft. Given Pokemon precedent though I am not hopeful on this one. NTK 22:41, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: I know there's a precedent for having articles on every single pokemon, but I'm interested in knowing where the exact discussion/policy/ruling is?--Frenchman113 23:48, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • There is no "policy" or "ruling." Everything is done on a case-by-case basis by "consensus" of whoever happens to make themselves heard. It's always possible to point to something on Wikipedia that is more obscure/ridiculous/non-notable than something else. NTK 02:33, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    There is a precident to keep all Pokemon creature article but if we tried to create an article on every card or every anime episode, thewy'd be deleted too. --Celestianpower háblame 14:51, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: Apparantly I forgot to list this on the deletion lists. Or, someone blanked it.--Frenchman113 00:19, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Yugicruft.--Zxcvbnm 00:21, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all but Ojama Trio, which should probably be merged to Chazz Princeton. Danny Lilithborne 00:55, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Those were deleted before. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amazoness Series and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yu-Gi-Oh! card lists. Speedy delete all. ' (Feeling chatty? ) (Edits!) 02:06, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all. FWIW, there's also the precedent of not keeping individual Magic: The Gathering cards: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juzam Djinn and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Serra Angel, among others. -Colin Kimbrell 17:33, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • I say delete all BUT Jinzo. Leave it alone. Weirdy 22:41, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • I must say that Jinzo seems to be least notable of them, appearing in the series only twice as I recall. Far less than say... the Ojama Trio which are also being nominated.--Frenchman113 on wheels! 13:15, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Jinzo hould be the only one deleted(Markcambrone 21:45, 15 April 2006 (UTC))[reply]
    • Okay so isthere any way to keep these, except Jinzo Markcambrone 21:47, 15 April 2006 (UTC))[reply]
  • Delete all except Jinzo SSJ 5 21:39, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Important Just so you know, I only did all of neo Spacian, and I only added the first two fusions on the Elemental Hero Neos page, which is my favorite one on this whole website since I ve seen the monster in the anime and it looks coolI jsut put some of the translation in my own words(Markcambrone 21:52, 15 April 2006 (UTC))[reply]
    • When I was looking for the translation, there were two of them for Neos, I just added te shorter one
  • Delete the Yu-Gi-Oh! card categories, and every single page involved with Yu-Gi-Oh!, except for Jinzo. Weirdy 21:08, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Okay so why is Jinzo so important? Markcambrone 01:23, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Because I like Jinzo. Weirdy 09:21, 17 April 2006 (UTC).[reply]
  • Jinzo is one of Joey's most favorite cards. And also is widely used because of its effect (At least in my country).--unsigned
  • We should leave the Ojama Trio page up for their history in the Anime. That goes for the Gravekeeper's series too. Rtkat3 08:07, 17 April 2006 (UTC).[reply]
  • Comments: Do you guys have ice running through your vains or something? First off, you shouldn't try to handle all these pages at once. Talk about stupid. Geez.
  • Definitely keep Jinzo (>.>) since he's been used by three duelists including himself and is generally a very popular card. Ojama's have a story get featured through the Chazz. Keep them. Nuff said. Dark Scorps where all brought to life and the feature of a whole episode. Before that, they were somewhat popular amongst players (especially their leader chris walk...I mean Don). Keep them. DMG is only in a slightly better/different situation. You wanna remove them but not her? I wonder why... Perhaps the Amazon and Amazoness cards should merged. The odd name change (seemingly due a writer shift) and multiple rogue/enemy duelists using them justifies an Article. Keep them. I could careless about the others, should i won't even bother with them, but i'd just say you'll regret deleting a article about the new protagonist's cards. Ace Class Shadow 00:54, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keeping individual card articles on the basis that they were the feature of one episode is ridiculous, you might as well keep articles on individual episodes then! Remember, this isn't a vote, you need a reason or your voice will go unheard. Also, articles on the protagonists' cards should be merged with the article on the protagonist. That's what people actually care about.--Frenchman113 on wheels! 13:16, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Amazoness_series&oldid=1137558304"