Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amazing Media

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 02:32, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Amazing Media[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORG. Quick Google search revealed most hits on this term were about a representation agency for musicians in the UK, so it's my assumption additional external sources are unlikely. South Nashua (talk) 18:40, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the company is a game developer that is indeed hard to find information about, but they've made multiple games that were notable enough for Wikipedia, and have made many of games for Interplay, the studio responsible for Earthworm Jim, Fallout, etc, so they are notable, just difficult to find info on, I will admit. Greasemann (talk) 23:28, 31 March 2017 (UTC)Greasemann[reply]

Delete GNG not met. Notability is not inherited - being involved in notable games is not enough. Exemplo347 (talk) 23:56, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Alright fine, it's not that great of an article anyways, as you can tell. Greasemann (talk) 00:02, 1 April 2017 (UTC)Greasemann[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Reach Out to the Truth 18:39, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Reach Out to the Truth 18:39, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.