Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amar Fayaz Buriro

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. While commenting that pages have to be "trashed" might be a bit too harsh, consensus is clear that this person's notability has not been established. SoWhy 20:11, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Amar Fayaz Buriro[edit]

Amar Fayaz Buriro (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

the subject received some press mentions (namechecking) but i believe they are not enough to pass WP's notability requirement. it was previously created at Amar Fayaz.. Saqib (talk) 12:50, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:25, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Subject fails to meet general notability guideline. Most publicity appears to have been self-generated. --Failosopher (talk) 15:03, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Linguist111 21:06, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. – Uanfala 21:13, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:11, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:11, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete a non-notable blogger.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:52, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep he is notable language engineer, there are references in Pakistan's leading newspapers about his services. Recently Sindh Graduate Association a Sindh Government funded organization has awarded him Gold medal on his services. --Indusian1236 (talk) 10:09, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If there are references in Pakistani newspapers, please provide here to establish the notability. The medal by Sindh Graduate Association is non-notable as well. --Saqib (talk) 10:37, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Amar Fayaz Buriro is Sindhi and urdu writer and he is wel known language engineer of Sindhi and Urdu languages. He had recently developed Sindhi OCR and auto tagging system. --Thaheem Ubed (talk) 11:04, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
— Thaheem Ubed (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Dear Saqib! I appreciate your reservations. But You know mostly Pakistani newspaper websites are image based, but here I am mentioning some text based references where you can easily find the Amar Fayaz Buriro's work where even minister and senator of Pakistan senate have praised his services. Moreover Amar Fayaz has been writing several articles and researches on language development and engineering. Here I am submitting some links:

It is mentioned here that above links are just newspaper & magazine links. Therefore I will really thankful to you that please may terminate the deletion tag from article. Secondly Sindh Graduates Association is the wel-reputable organization of the Pakistan. They award only 4 Gold medals in a year, and in education and language development they had awarded him this medal. Regards and Thanks in advance. --Indusian1236 (talk) 11:25, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Most of above sources are not RS, while RS such as Dawn, The News, Express Tribune only name check the subject. --Saqib (talk) 11:29, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Saqib, It is humble request that please may keep this article. As I have requested that in Pakistan 90% newspapers are online in image based. Therefore please may consider this request. Regards --Indusian1236 (talk) 11:37, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Clearly no notability for the subject. Fails WP:GNG. Greenbörg (talk) 12:39, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep This is my earnest request that please keep this article because there are various references available on the article page. Ok I may delete writer/blogger words from the article. But he is notable language engineer. I request again. --Indusian1236 (talk) 13:03, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • OK dears... I respect your decision. You may delete. I have raised my hands. Regards. I love and respect Wikipedia... The resource of knowledge and wisdom. --Indusian1236 (talk) 15:13, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • But if possible please let it alive on wikipedia for one month. After one month you may delete it. This is my request. --Indusian1236 (talk) 15:24, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No sorry, the page has to be trashed soon. --Saqib (talk) 15:27, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ok dear Saqib go on plz. Stay blessed. Regards --Indusian1236 (talk) 15:29, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Deeply troubling, for me, to see a vote which wants to see an article "trashed soon". This process should be in good faith, certainly not personal. Non-English references are hard to track, many appear above. I vote notable enough. --Ifnord (talk) 22:04, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Amar_Fayaz_Buriro&oldid=1137558077"