Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amanda steele

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) SSTflyer 01:24, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Amanda steele[edit]

Amanda steele (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources, last name not capitalized (although can be fixed via a redirect). There are some sources out there but wanted to nominate for deletion to see if the sources are enough to warrant an article on this person. Andise1 (talk) 20:28, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Here are some sources I have found via searching Google News:

There are plenty of sources out there which are about Amanda Steele or mention her in some way (I tried to exclude sources that just briefly mentioned her name or did not seem relevant for her Wikipedia page). Whether these sources are good enough to keep the article is to be determined, but if the consensus is to keep the article, then we can add these sources to the article. I don't have a major issue with keeping or deleting the article, since there may be some room for improvement (but possibly not enough), thus I mainly decided to nominate the article for deletion to seek the opinions of others. Andise1 (talk) 20:58, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep Appears to me to plainly pass notability guidelines based on considerable coverage in multiple independent and reliable sources. Agree that the article should be improved; starting with the last name :D. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡbomb 00:08, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:15, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:15, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:15, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment This article was likely created with the small "s" last name since the proper capitalization was WP:SALTed.--☾Loriendrew☽ (ring-ring) 23:28, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete non-notable blogger, lots of mentions no indepth coverage.John Pack Lambert (talk) 08:40, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Ginsengbomb is right. Notability guidelines passes. plenty of good sources. Sources trumps IDONTLIKEIT.BabbaQ (talk) 19:56, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Clear GNG pass per a selection of the sources cited above by Andise1. Carrite (talk) 16:58, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - If the article is to be keeped (which it looks like it's headed that way), the article should be redirected to "Amanda Steele". The "Amanda Steele" article is not protected but I don't want to move it while there is a deletion discussion ongoing. Andise1 (talk) 20:00, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.