Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amanda Prantera

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Chaser - T 03:26, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Amanda Prantera[edit]

notability tagged since January and orphaned since August, I have to wonder if she is not wiki worthy Postcard Cathy 15:56, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete 10,000 ghits, and she's authored six books, but the standard notability criteria are not fulfilled. Yechiel Man 16:02, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- lucasbfr ^talk 11:20, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Proquest shows fifteen reviews of eight of her books in major publications, including Publishers Weekly (called "Letter to Lorenzo "absorbing literary thriller") , New York Times Book Review, The Atlantic, The Times Literary Supplement, and New Statesman & Society (Myths and mirrors -- The Kingdom of Fanes by Amanda Prantera, Barrett, David V. New Statesman & Society. London: Aug 18, 1995. Vol.8, Iss. 366; pg. 34) which says "Beautiful, moving and tragic, this book confirms Amanda Prantera's reputation as an exceptional writer." The article can be expanded and improved. Edison 19:35, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 21:31, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - Meets WP:BIO, but (as currently written) just barely. Please expand. --Evb-wiki 18:16, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep per Edison. If kept, perhaps a note on the article's talk page to the effect of "for possible sources, see the AfD discussion" would be helpful. -- Black Falcon ^(Talk) 22:14, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.