Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amanda Daflos

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No prejudice against re-nominating (though try pinging Megalibrarygirl before you do) Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 13:08, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Amanda Daflos[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability concerns. The independent references are simply her giving interviews as part of her job, not significant coverage. power~enwiki (π, ν) 18:36, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:42, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Gameinfirmary (talk) 19:25, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. There are sources which clearly indicate her notability, e.g. [1].--Ipigott (talk) 09:28, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to a new page about the Los Angeles Innovation Delivery Team - it appears that there is notability, but her notability appears to be secondary to that of the project. Jmertel23 (talk) 18:32, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. There are many sources that state her notability. Meets WP:BASIC [2].--cbratbyrudd (talk) 09:28, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sources such as jewish journal, Smithtown Matters in addition to the sources listed above by other keepers. Just meets WP:GNG. Being the ~~creator~~ director of a notable organization is notable too (can't list all such examples) JC7V-constructive zone 20:15, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I say notable organization because Jmertel23 basically said there could be an article for the organization on here. JC7V-constructive zone 20:16, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to something about the Los Angeles Innovation Delivery Team. 100% of available sources are about her doing her job, as nom says. Even the Govtech source above by Ipigott is just an announcement of her doing her job. Take away the job, you got nothing.198.58.175.190 (talk) 20:35, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and comments by IP. Individual isn't notable, suggest material is merged with an article about the Los Angeles Innovation Delivery Team. W C M_email 12:15, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 11:21, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. the sources for the biography are indiscriminate. I'm not convinced the organization is notable either, but someone could try writing an article on it, and then a redirect could be made. DGG ( talk ) 23:03, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Alpha3031 (t • c) 13:15, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Govtech seems like the best source here, but none of the other sources remotely satisfy GNG. wumbolo ^^^ 16:59, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.